ABSTRACT
Objectives: Telemedicine can improve access to pediatric otolaryngology care by decreasing travel time and cost, and lowering the risk of viral transmission during the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study aims to identify the clinical role and outcomes of telemedicine for tracheostomy-dependent children before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Retrospective chart review of 42 tracheostomy-dependent pediatric patients who utilized telemedicine between October 2013 and April 2020 (pre-COVID-19), and 111 patients who utilized telemedicine between May 2020 and July 2021 (during COVID-19) at a tertiary free-standing children's hospital outpatient clinic. Results: The majority of pre-COVID-19 telecommunication solely addressed tracheostomy stomal concerns as compared with during COVID-19 (99% vs. 3%, p < .001), while telecommunication during COVID-19 was mainly used for routine follow-up as compared with pre-COVID-19 (99% vs. 0%, p < .001). Telemedicine visits during COVID-19 were significantly less likely to result in the need for in-person office visits as compared with those pre-COVID-19 (4% vs. 22%; p < .001). There was no significant difference in urgent emergency department (ED) evaluation following telemedicine pre- and during COVID-19 (16% vs. 11%). The most common reasons for ED presentation both pre- and during COVID-19 following telemedicine visit included respiratory distress, dislodged tracheostomy tube, and tracheostomy bleeding. Conclusion: The clinical role of telemedicine has evolved from problem-based evaluation to routine follow-up during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although telemedicine can decrease the need for in-person office evaluation of routine tracheostomy concerns, respiratory complications and tracheostomy bleeding still require urgent in-person ED evaluation. Level of evidence: Level 4.
ABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE: Adequate sampling of the nasopharynx is crucial to performing accurate SARS-CoV-2 (COVID) testing. Formalized education of nasal anatomy may improve provider testing technique and reduce false-negative test results. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of nasal anatomy education on medical providers' comfort level and knowledge base in performing accurate SARS-CoV-2 (COVID) testing. STUDY DESIGN: Pre-post survey. SETTINGS: Tertiary care academic hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 17 nurses performing COVID testing were enrolled. INTERVENTION: An educational session on COVID nasopharyngeal testing technique and nasal anatomy was presented by an otolaryngologist. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: A pre-session survey assessed providers' prior nasal testing training and COVID testing challenges. Provider comfort level with COVID testing was surveyed pre-and post-session. A 6-question nasal anatomy test was administered pre- and post-session. RESULTS: 16 out of 17 nurses performed fewer than 10 COVID tests prior to the educational session (94%). Reported challenges with COVID testing included patient discomfort (79.6%), inability to pass the test swab (23.5%) and nasal bleeding (11.8%). The number of providers comfortable with independently performing COVID testing increased from pre- to post-session (5 and 14, p = 0.013). The average number of correct responses to the 6-question nasal anatomy test increased following the session (3.2 ± 1.2 to 5.1 ± 1.1, p = 0.003). Specifically, the number of providers able to localize the nasopharynx increased from 8 providers pre-session to 14 providers post-session (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Early implementation of nasal anatomy and nasopharyngeal swab technique education can help improve provider comfort and knowledge in performing accurate COVID testing.